Senate Panel Rejects Bonus Share and Super Tax

Hi everyone! I hope you are all doing well. Welcome back to another blog. This article will discuss the topic in detail “Senate Panel Rejects Bonus Share and Super Tax”. The Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue rejected all sections of the Finance Bill 2023 related to ‘Bonus Share’ and ‘Super Tax’. The rejection was unanimous among committee members from different political parties. The latest session was chaired by Senator Saleem Mandviwalla, an experienced and influential figure. The committee conducted meticulous deliberations and analyses of the proposed bill.

Senator Mandviwalla, known for his expertise in economic matters, skillfully steered the committee’s proceedings and ensured that all members had ample opportunities to express their viewpoints. The committee members, representing diverse backgrounds and interests, actively participated in the discussions, offering their insights and raising pertinent questions.

Finally, on Friday, the committee successfully concluded its review of the Finance Bill for the fiscal year 2023-2024. In addition to addressing the sections related to ‘Bonus Share’ and ‘Super Tax’, the committee also tackled other deferred items, critically examining their implications and making well-informed recommendations.

The Senate Standing Committee displayed responsible governance and safeguarded public interests through a rigorous examination of the Finance Bill. The committee rejected sections on ‘Bonus Share’ and ‘Super Tax’, signaling concerns and the need for further evaluation and potential amendments. Each deferred item was diligently evaluated, leading to several recommendations and decisions. Suitable items were accepted, while unsuitable ones were rejected for the final report. The committee committed to discussing recommendations even after the budget, emphasizing thorough analysis. Ultimately, they reached a consensus to accept all deferred items of the Customs Act, demonstrating their commitment to effective resolution.

See also  Massive Dip in Petroleum Sales Hits PSO, Shell, and Attock Hard

During the meeting, thorough deliberations took place concerning all sections encompassed within the deferred ambit of 99D. The authority to address this issue lies solely with the federal cabinet, not the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). The committee emphasized that the FBR has no jurisdiction over this matter. Imposing an 18 percent tax on consumer goods sold under brand names or trademarks would burden the end consumer. Retailers would exploit loopholes within the tax regime to evade their obligations, as highlighted by the committee.

Senators Rukhsana Zuberi, Saadia Abbasi, and Kauda Babar actively participated in budget deliberations and presented comprehensive general recommendations. The Telecom Foundation expressed serious concerns about the 15 percent regulatory duty and advocated for a 2 percent reduction to benefit the sector. They strongly opposed the imposition of a super tax, highlighting its negative impact on industry growth and economic stability. Although, the committee chairman demanded a detailed briefing on the contrasting tax levies for filers and non-filers. The chairman noted the lack of incentives or favorable treatment for tax-compliant individuals in relation to domestic item taxes.

During the meeting, a representative from Pepsi-Cola International actively participated and provided insightful observations. He emphasized that there has been a noticeable decline of 40 percent in the sales of carbonated beverages subsequent to the implementation of the mini-budget. This decline coincided with a considerable 20 percent rise in the federal excise duty (FED) imposed on these beverages.

The committee, recognizing the significance of these developments, expressed their commitment to thoroughly deliberate on the matter. They will convene again on Monday to further analyze the data and formulate comprehensive recommendations. Their objective is to produce a comprehensive report that outlines effective strategies to address the challenges faced by the carbonated beverage industry in light of the recent tax changes.

See also  Pakistan's Education Budget in FY 23


Leave a Comment